Doppler test Vs flaccid ultrasound for detection of early fibrosis

[shrunken_dick]

Hello friends, here is the link to my recent post.

https://www.peyroniesforum.net/index.php/topic,14346.0.html

I am noticing that I am developing a 20-degree curve at the base of my penis. There also seems to be constriction at the base of my penis, which appears to be non-elastic. I have lost almost more than an inch in length. The top urologist in my city says this all is in my mind, even though he did not see my penis in an erect state. He basically refused to go for a penile doppler test. Therefore I reached out to a radiologist, and he agrees to do a penile doppler test. But my radiologist says that the penile doppler test is done for the venous leak, not the peronies. He is suggesting me a simple flaccid state ultrasound would detect the peronies. I am baffled and afraid to go for the doppler test because they are going to inject my penis with Papaverine, which can also cause me fibrosis.

Therefore I am asking you people about your opinion. Which test should I go for? Please help.  

[TonySa]

The flaccid ultrasound is sufficient to identify the plaque according to most docs.  I'd start w that.

[shrunken_dick]

@tonysha ;
But if the plaque has not been calcified then which test would be better to detect fibrosis?

[TonySa]

Flaccid ultrasound or erect-either will do.