L-Arginine vs. Cialis

[vegahoma]

Hey, everyone! Long time no post. My first lump popped up just over a year ago, and my urologist put me on daily Cialis, and I've been pretty happy with it. My original lump has now reduced in size to the point that it's barely noticeable, and the associated indentation is almost gone, too. Unfortunately, a new lump popped up out of nowhere last month, and it's causing a slightly larger indentation.

I saw a new urologist, and she recommended I take L-Arginine instead of Cialis, because she said they both stimulate blood flow to the penis. Also, it's MUCH cheaper than Cialis, and I don't have the money to buy another 30 days of pills right now. I'm a little nervous about switching, though, since Cialis has always worked so well. I don't have any Erectile Dysfunction, so I'm not worried about that. I just don't want my deformity to progress.

Anyone have any opinions?

[NeoV]

Cialis works differently than arginine and citrulline, as it is a pd3 inhibitor. Cialis basically closes the gate so nitric oxide stays in the penis, while arginine increases it, or something along those lines.

Cialis probably works better long term, since arginine and citrulline get down regulated fast by the body. That said, using it at odd times or before sex is a good idea.

[TonySa]

Perhaps consider low dose generic viagra (50 mg).  It's very inexpensive generic now.  Check out local and mail order prices at goodrx.com

[Carlton]

Hey! I can definitely understand your hesitation. For me personally, Cialis has worked great, not only in terms of effectiveness but also its pricing. It provides consistent results and suits my needs, both for managing ED and improving overall blood flow. While L-Arginine is often suggested for its blood flow benefits, I've found that Cialis offers a more targeted and reliable effect. Since you're already comfortable with Cialis and it's been helping with your situation, I'd be cautious about switching to something else, especially when it comes to dealing with a condition like yours. The cost difference is valid, but the stability and effectiveness of Cialis might be worth considering as a long-term solution. It's always good to consult your urologist, but personally, I'd stick with what's been working well for you.

[LWillisjr]

Don't expect a response. You are posting in a thread that is 6 years old.