Is using a
VED two times a day for 10 min each time the same as achieving a natural erection for the same length of time? Just curious how they differ since both involve blood going to the penis and creating a stretch.
The only difference I can think of is that you would potentially get a better erection from the
VED, but based on the protocol I read you don’t even pump to full erection anyway.
Also, I will say when using the
VED, afterwards I’m straight as an arrow. I’ve always had a slight curve to the left, and even that is completely gone after
VED use. I was only using the 2 inch cyclinder for a while but just ordered a 1.75 as well.
In my head, it would make sense that to get a “controlled erection” where your penis is quite literally modeled by the cylinder while becoming erect, it would naturally train your penis to adopt that form (straight form of the cylinder)
That being said, I get my erections twice a day from the
VED. One time a day I do more of a very gentle stretch versus
traction. Since I don’t have a huge curve and it’s mostly indentation/hinge from
plaque, I’m not trying to bend anything. More so I’m trying to massage the area below the
plaque and move my way up to the gland gently pulling out. Figured if anything this would create a light stretch but also massage the
plaque and create more blood flow.
I can’t help but feel like the actual manual
traction I was doing before wasn’t helping, and if anything possibly hurting progress. I was following neos advice. I know it worked for him but I definitely don’t think it works for everyone-and I believe he would advise the same.
What are your thoughts on
VED use versus natural erecting via masturbation? Do you think what I mentioned above is accurate?