Thanks both for your input.
The aim of the implant was not to get a perfect penis, we all know an implant is never going to be the same as a blood-filled erection but I guess everyone who goes down the implant route expects, or certainly hopes for the best possible outcome, especially when it is paid for out of pocket and not via insurance like you guys over the pond.
The implant works, and it works very well actually. Us Bionic brothers can do things which no one with a natural penis can do and I find that very exciting. For me, my issues are both an aesthetic issue and a practical issue. When fully inflated the top 20-25% of the penis droops and just doesn't look right. I can't send 'sexy pics' to my girlfriend as it just looks a bit weird. Practically, the sex is really good, and I'd choose what I have no over what I had immediately pre-op in a heartbeat. However, because of the floppiness, certain positions, like her on top, are difficult as it is difficult to penetrate. That alone doesn't warrant a revision, but both these combined with the constant fear of erosion and the tips breaking through the skin in my eyes warrant a revision. I'm a perfectionist by nature. but I do also have to consider my diabetes and the fact that I am more prone to an infection.
I have faith in my new surgeon, he has since told me he will measure me on the operating table, which gives me confidence, so currently I am going down the revision route, probably in February/March next year.
I know that any revision is harder for the surgeon but easier for the patient. Why is that? Any ideas of recovery time compared to an initial surgery? I took 6-8 weeks before I felt healed enough to walk properly and start wearing normal clothes. Can I expect/hope for this to be halved if the surgery went well?
Thanks as always